Administrative Contracts: Reflections on the limitations of exorbitant clauses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69971/3jxfn210Keywords:
prerogatives, exorbitant clauses, mitigations, economic and financial balanceAbstract
In view of the inherent prerogatives of the Public Power vis-à-vis private individuals in administrative contracts, this article aims to reflect on exorbitant clauses in administrative contracts, their use, their characteristics, their species and their limitations. Based on this analysis, the topic of certain rights and guarantees in the Constitution was explored, such as the supremacy of the public interest over the private interest and economic and financial equilibrium. In order to carry out this work, a study was carried out through bibliographical research, analysis of legal provisions and doctrinal teachings in the areas of constitutional and administrative law. In fact, due to these principles, the feasibility and possibility of restricting the indiscriminate and abusive use of exorbitant clauses by the Public Administration was verified, since the legitimate use of such prerogatives is not indiscriminate and can be mitigated.
References
Brazil. Presidency of the Republic.1988. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, of October 5. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br.
Brazil. Presidency of the Republic.1993. Law n. 8.666, of June 21, 1993.Lei de licitações e contratos administrativos. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br.
Brazil. Presidency of the Republic. 2021. Law no. 14.133, of April 1, 2021. Regulates art. 37, item XXI, of the Federal Constitution, establishes rules for public administration bids and contracts and makes other provisions. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br.
Carvalho Filho, José Dos Santos. 2012. Manual de Direito Administrativo. 25th ed. Lumen Júris, Rio de Janeiro: Brazil.
Cunha Júnior, Dirley. 2012. Curso de Direito Administrativo. 11th ed. JusPodivm, Salvador: Brazil.
Di Pietro, Maria Sylvia Zanella. 2012. Administrative Law. 25th ed. Atlas, São Paulo: Brazil.
Gil, Antonio Carlos. 1987. Methods and Techniques of Social Research. Atlas, São Paulo: Brazil.
Gonçalves, C. R. 2011. Brazilian Civil Law. 6th ed. Saraiva, São Paulo: Brazil.
Jensen, Klaus Bruh, Jankowski Nicholas W. 1995. A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. Routledge, New York: US.
Justen Filho, Marçal. 2000. Comentários à Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos. 12th ed. Dialética, São Paulo: Brazil.
Justen Filho, Marçal. 2000. Course in Administrative Law. 4th ed. Saraiva, São Paulo: Brazil.
Marinela, Fernanda. 2012. Administrative Law. 6th ed. Impetus, Rio de Janeiro: Brazil.
Marinela, Fernanda. 2017. Administrative law. 11th ed. Saraiva, São Paulo: Brazil.
Meirelles, Hely Lopes .2000. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 25th ed. Malheiros, São Paulo: Brazil.
Meirelles, Hely Lopes.2016. Direito Administrativo Brasileiro. 42th ed. Malheiros, São Paulo: Brazil.
Teixeira, E. 2002. The Three Methodologies: Academic, Science snd Research. Universidade da Amazônia, Belém: Brazil.
Triviños, Augusto Nibaldo Silva. 1987. Introdução a Pesquisa Em Ciências Sociais, a Pesquisa Qualitativa Em Educação – O Positivismo, A Fenomenologia, O Marxismo. Atlas, São Paulo: Brazil.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
