Digital Social Innovation and Sustainability: Theory, Practice, and Debate

Authors

  • Mamadayupova Vasila Shonazarovna Tashkent State University of Law image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69971/dss.3.1.2026.52

Keywords:

digital social innovation, sustainable development goals, social innovation, platform cooperativism, digital divide, data colonialism, civic technology

Abstract

Digital social innovation (DSI), the use of digital technologies by citizens, civil society organizations, social enterprises, and public institutions to develop novel solutions to social and environmental problems, has evolved over the past decade and a half as a distinct field of research and practice at the intersection of technology studies, innovation studies, and sustainability science. Current study explores the interdisciplinary literature on DSI and its relationship to sustainability, in its triple-bottom-line sense of environmental, social, and economic dimensions. It traces the conceptual roots of DSI in the broader social innovation literature and in information-systems research on digital innovation, reviews the major theoretical frameworks, including a nascent multidimensional framework spanning digital technology, innovation process, and sustainability focus to connect digital innovation to sustainable development, and examines empirical evidence on how digitally enabled initiatives, from open data commons and citizen science to platform cooperatives, civic technology, telemedicine, and precision agriculture, contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The research engages critically with the limits of DSI's contribution, including the digital divide, the environmental footprint of digital infrastructure itself, the phenomenon of data colonialism, and the tendency toward technological solutionism, before setting out a twelve-pathway research agenda and highlights practical implications for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers. DSI offers a genuine, if bounded and unevenly distributed, set of tools for advancing sustainability, and its future contribution depends less on the sophistication of the technology involved than on the governance arrangements, funding ecosystems, and power relations within which that technology is embedded.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelidou, Margarita, and Artemis Psaltoglou. 2018. Digital Social Innovation in Support of Spatial Planning: An Investigation through Nine Initi-atives in Three Smart City Programmes. Spatium 39: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839007A

Ariansyah, Ariansyah, and Saiful Prayogi et al. 2024. Digital Technology to Support Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Literature Review. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika 12. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v12i2.13557

Ayob, Noorseha, Simon Teasdale et al. 2016. How Social Innovation 'Came to Be': Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept. Journal of Social Policy 45 (4): 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X

Belkhir, Lotfi, and Ahmed Elmeligi. 2018. Assessing ICT Global Emissions Footprint: Trends to 2040 and Recommendations. Journal of Cleaner Production 177: 448–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.239

Bria, Francesca. 2014. Digital Social Innovation. DSI4EU Project Interim Report. https://waag.org/sites/waag/files/media/publicaties/dsi-report-complete-lr.pdf

Buck, Christoph, Anna Krombacher, Maximilian Röglinger, and Katharina Körner-Wyrtki. 2023. Doing Good by Going Digital: A Taxonomy of Digital Social Innovation in the Context of Incumbents. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101806

Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany. 2014. Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 82: 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008

Cangiano, Sara, and Zoe Romano, eds. 2017. Digital Social Innovation Toolkit. Nesta/DSI4EU. https://dsi4eu.github.io/toolkit/assets/downloads/DSIToolkit-complete.pdf

Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press: 1-352. https://www.sup.org/books/sociology/costs-connection

Da Silva-Jean, Marcos, and Jordana Marques Kneipp. 2024. Social Learning, Innovation, and Sustainability: The Search for Directions Beyond a Systematic Literature Review. Heliyon 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28431

Dal Gobbo, Alice, and Francesca Forno. 2025. Ecosocial Innovation and 'Twin Transitions': A Critical Reflection on the Tension between Sustainability and Digitalization. Stato e Mercato 2: 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1425/118440

Dionisio, Marcelo and Sylvio Jorge de Souza Junior et al. 2024. The Role of Digital Social Innovations to Address SDGs: A Systematic Review. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26: 5709–5734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03038-x

Elkington, John. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone. https://dn721609.ca.archive.org/0/items/BusinessMoneyBooksarchive/Cannibals%20With%20Forks%20-%20The%20Triple%20Bottom%20Line%20of%2021st%20Century%20Business.pdf

European Commission. 2015. Growing a Digital Social Innovation Ecosystem for Europe. DSI Final Report, commissioned by the European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/growing-digital-social-innovation-ecosystem-europe

Flex, Boyd and Spatz Ben et al. 2025. EcoGPX®: A Digital Tool Rooted in People and Place. The Turing Way Practitioners Hub Case Study Series. 2024–25. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15882525

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2024. Digital Villages Initiative in Asia and the Pacific. Food and Agriculture Organization. https://www.fao.org/digital-villages-initiative/asia-pacific/en

International Telecommunication Union. 2025. Pakistan's Smart Villages Transform Lives. ITU News. https://www.itu.int/hub/2025/04/pakistans-smart-villages-transform-lives/

Jin, Xin, and Wenying Yu. 2022. Information and Communication Technology and Carbon Emissions in China: The Rebound Effect of Energy Intensive Industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption 32: 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.004

Kohli, Rajiv, and Nigel P. Melville. 2019. Digital Innovation: A Review and Synthesis. Information Systems Journal 29: 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12193

Krombacher, Anna, and Anna-Katharina Lindenthal et al. 2026. Sustainable through Digital: A Research Agenda for Digital Social Innovation. Information Systems Frontiers 28: 381–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10664-5

Lange, Steffen, and Johanna Pohl, et al. 2020. Digitalization and Energy Consumption: Does ICT Reduce Energy Demand? Ecological Economics 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760

Mulgan, Geoff, and Simon Tucker, et al. 2007. Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated. The Young Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs89dd3

Mulgan, Geoff. 2019. Social Innovation: How Societies Find the Power to Change. Bristol University Press: 1-288. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvs89dd3

Nesta. n.d. The European Digital Social Innovation Index. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/feature/european-digital-social-innovation-index/

Peña-López, Ismael. 2017. decidim.barcelona: From e-Participation to the Devolution of Sovereignty. ICT4D Blog. https://ictlogy.net/20171010-case-study-decidim-barcelona-spain/

Phills, James A., Kriss Deiglmeier, and Dale T. Miller. 2008. Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review 6: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.48558/GBJY-GJ47

Rijal, Syamsu and Erwin Erwin et al. 2025. Digitalization and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Bibliometric Analysis of the Role of Technology. 2025. Sustainable Development Insights 1: 14–27. https://doi.org/10.58812/sdi.v2i01.1788

Scholz, Trebor. 2014. Platform Cooperativism vs. the Sharing Economy. Medium. https://medium.com/@trebors/platform-cooperativism-vs-the-sharing-economy-2ea737f1b5ad

Scholz, Trebor. 2016. Platform Cooperativism: Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung. https://rosalux.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/RLS-NYC_platformcoop.pdf

The Nation. 2025. Mobilink Bank Powers Girls' Digital Education by Solarizing Zindagi Trust's Digital Arts Lab in Karachi. The Nation. https://www.nation.com.pk/31-Dec-2025/mobilink-bank-powers-girls-digital-education-solarizing-zindagi-trust-s-digital-arts-lab-karachi

Tracey, Paul, and Neil Stott. 2017. Social Innovation: A Window on Alternative Ways of Organizing and Innovating. Innovation Organization and Management 19: 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924

Van der Have, Robert P., and Luis Rubalcaba. 2016. Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies? Research Policy 45: 1923–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010

Varriale, Vincenzo and Mark Anthony Camilleri et al. 2025. Unleashing Digital Transformation to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals across Multiple Sectors. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3139

Web 3.0 Platforms for Sustainable Digital Social Innovation. 2026. Digital Business. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/digital-business/about/call-for-papers

WeMake. 2019. What Is (Not) Digital Social Innovation? Waag. https://waag.org/en/article/what-not-digital-social-innovation/

World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shonazarovna, Mamadayupova Vasila. 2026. “Digital Social Innovation and Sustainability: Theory, Practice, and Debate”. Digital Social Sciences 3 (1): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.69971/dss.3.1.2026.52.