Digital Literature and social media as Contemporary Literary Spaces: Impact on Connection, Well-Being, and Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69971/dss.3.1.2026.54Keywords:
digital humanities, social media, participatory culture, literacy, well-being, social capitalAbstract
Digital literature and social media have completely changed how texts are composed, read and understood and how relationships are formed, lived and participated in, as well as how identities are constructed. Social media is not just a space filled with Communications, but a space where people can make digital literary texts, with narratives, poems, personal stories, memes and multimodal texts circulating around the world. This paper reviews pertinent recent research and empirical studies on the effects of these digital literary environments on social interaction, mental health, youth development, political discussions, and social inequality. Opportunities and challenges are assessed in the review. Digital literary practices promote creativity, collaborative storytelling, self-expression, cultural engagement, and social support, on one hand. On the other hand, they have been linked to well-documented problems like social comparison, compulsive use, misinformation, algorithmic amplification, and exposure to harmful content, especially by adolescents. The paper also discusses the connection between digital literature, polarization, and the digital divide, suggesting that access inequalities to digital textual culture contribute to inequalities in society and education. The paper synthesizes various interdisciplinary perspectives from media studies, digital humanities, communication and psychology, to find that digital literature, and social media in general, is not automatically good or bad. Their social impact is grounded in patterns of creating, interpreting, technological design and engaging with a user. Digital literacy, ethical governance of platform production processes, and ongoing cross-disciplinary research into new forms of AI-supported and participatory digital literature are important points emphasized in the study.
Downloads
References
Aarseth, Espen J. 1997. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Agyapong-Opoku, Nadine, Felix Agyapong-Opoku, and Andrew J. Greenshaw. 2025. Effects of Social Media Use on Youth and Adolescent Mental Health: A Scoping Review of Reviews. Behavioral Sciences 15 (5): 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050574
Ancillai, Chiara, Silvia Bartoloni, Jasna Filipovic, and Valentina Temperini. 2025. The Role of Online Communities in Shaping the Society 5.0 Paradigm: A Social Capital Perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management 28 (5): 1890–1915. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2024-0168
Assefa, Yonas, Melese Mihret Gebremeskel, Beniam Tadesse Moges, Shubhankar Amit Tilwani, and Yesuneh Alemu Azmera. 2025. Rethinking the Digital Divide and Associated Educational In(equity) in Higher Education in the Context of Developing Countries: The Social Justice Per-spective. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 42 (1): 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2024-0058
Burgess, Kristin. 2025. The Decline in Adolescents' Mental Health with the Rise of Social Media: A Narrative Review. Journal of School Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535251328925
Cai, Yingying, Syafila Kamarudin, and Saiful Nujaimi. 2025. Willingness to Share Information on Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review (2020–2024). Frontiers in Psychology 16: 1567506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567506
Cho, Hyunyi, Julie Cannon, Rachel Lopez, and Wenbo Li. 2022. Social Media Literacy: A Conceptual Framework. New Media & Society 26 (2): 941–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
Conte, Giulia, Giulia Diomede Iorio, Debora Esposito, Silvia Romano, Federica Panvino, Sara Maggi, and Alberto Terrinoni. 2025. Scrolling through Adolescence: A Systematic Review of the Impact of TikTok on Adolescent Mental Health. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 34: 1511–1527.
de Arruda, Henrique Ferraz, Felipe Maciel Cardoso, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Alexis R. Hernández, Luciano da Fontoura Costa, and Yamir Moreno. 2024. Echo Chamber Formation Sharpened by Priority Users. iScience 27 (11): 111098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111098
Dera, Jeroen. 2024. BookTok: A Narrative Review of Current Literature and Directions for Future Research. Literature Compass 21 (10–12): e70012. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.70012
Dezuanni, Michael, Katya Johanson, Marcus O'Donnell, and Miranda Osborne. 2022. Selfies and Shelfies on #Bookstagram and #Booktok – Social Media and the Mediation of Australian Teen Reading. Learning, Media and Technology 47 (3): 355–372.
Groenestein, Ellen, Lotte Willemsen, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, and Peter Kerkhof. 2025. Fear of Missing Out and Social Media Use: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study on the Interplay with Psychological Need Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being. New Media & Society 27 (7): 4205–4227. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241235935
Guo, Alicia, Shreya Sathyanarayanan, Leijie Wang, Jeffrey Heer, and Amy X. Zhang. 2025. From Pen to Prompt: How Creative Writers Integrate AI into Their Writing Practice In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, 527–545. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Hayles, N. Katherine. 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hossain, Md Siddique. 2025. Literature in the Digital Age: Challenges and Embracing Opportunities. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 47(4):690-698.
Hou, Jenny Zhengye. 2025. Sharing Is Caring': Participatory Storytelling and Community Building on Social Media Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 69 (12): 1481–1501. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231164040
Hubert, Kent F., Kim N. Awa, and Darya L. Zabelina. 2024. The Current State of Artificial Intelligence Generative Language Models Is More Creative than Humans on Divergent Thinking Tasks. Scientific Reports 14: 3440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53303-w
Hwang, Angel Hsing-Chi, Q. Vera Liao, Su Lin Blodgett, Alexandra Olteanu, and Adam Trischler. 2025. It Was 80% Me, 20% AI': Seeking Au-thenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9 (2): 1–41.
Hyatt, Madison. 2024. #Booktok: Social Media's Influence on Literature. Honors thesis, University of Richmond. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses/1742.
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jian, Zou, and Mahadi. 2025. Social Media, Digital Literacy, and Career Competence: A Mixed Methods Study among University Students in China. Frontiers in Psychology 16: 1700213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1700213
Li, Eve Cheuk-Yin, and Ka Wing Pang. 2024. Fandom Meets Artificial Intelligence: Rethinking Participatory Culture as Human–Community–Machine Interactions. European Journal of Cultural Studies 27 (4): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241236146
Liu, L., et al. 2025. Navigating the Digital Horizon: A Proposed Framework and Assessment of Digital Literacy. ETS Research Report RR-25-06. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
O'Sullivan, James. 2025. Stylometric Comparisons of Human versus AI-Generated Creative Writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communica-tions 12: 1708. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05986-3
Pierce, Glenn L., and Paul F. Cleary. 2024. The Persistent Educational Digital Divide and Its Impact on Societal Inequality. PlosOne 19 (4): e0286795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286795
Przybylski, Andrew K., Kou Murayama, Cody R. DeHaan, and Valerie Gladwell. 2013. Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (4): 1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. 2025. Most People Want Platforms (Not Governments) to Be Responsible for Moderating Content. University of Oxford, September 30. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/most-people-want-platforms-not-governments-be-responsible-moderating-content
Ryan, Richard M., and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist 55 (1): 68–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Santos, Augusto, Regina Cazzamatta, and Carlo José Napolitano. 2025. Holding Platforms Accountable in the Fight against Misinformation: A Cross-National Analysis of State-Established Content Moderation Regulations. Global Media and Communication 21 (2): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485251348550
Tølbøll, K. S., et al. 2026. Social Media Use and Adolescent Mental Health: An Umbrella Review and Power Analysis. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70071
Vanner, Catherine, Meenal Singh, and Valerie Alexander. 2025. Virtual Digital Storytelling: Building Solidarity in Transnational Participatory Re-search. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 24: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251352061
Wang, Siyu. 2024. The Impact of the Digital Divide on Educational Equity. SHS Web of Conferences 222: 04004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522204004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mizanur Rahman, Mahmudul Hasan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
