The Endless Mesh: Life in the Societies of Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69971/dss.3.2.2026.66Keywords:
algorithmic governance, digital panopticon, disciplinary power, dividual, psychopolitics, societies of control, subjectivityAbstract
This paper analyzes the structural and conceptual transition from Michel Foucault’s “disciplinary society” to Gilles Deleuze’s “society of control,” examining its profound implications for the social production of subjectivity in contemporary digital environments. Grounded in Foucault’s formulation of discipline as a mechanism that optimizes bodies through spatial compartmentalization and discrete institutional enclosures – such as the school, factory, hospital and prison – the study explores how Deleuze reinterprets this framework in light of evolving computational infrastructures and datafication. As foundational modern institutions face a crisis of legitimacy, power shifts from fixed physical molds to continuous, fluid modulations, transforming the governance unit from the unified “individual” into the datafied “dividual” – a subject decomposed into numerical codes and algorithmic data streams. The investigation details how this mutation erodes classic modern dichotomies (interior/exterior, public/private, self/Other) as physical public spaces are sublimated into politically inert virtual non-spaces governed by platform capitalism, predictive feedback loops and automated protocols. At the macro-level, the disappearance of a dialectical “Other” hollows out traditional state sovereignty, establishing the global market as the supreme diagram of contemporary power. Finally, the paper demonstrates how the carceral network transitions from physical confinement to a psychopolitical digital panopticon. Embedded within personal devices and notification loops, digital control operates through voluntary self-quantification and continuous engagement. The society of control does not dismantle disciplinary power, but rather digitizes and intensifies it, creating an omnipresent “endless mesh” that continuously generates subjectivity across every layer of daily existence.
Downloads
References
Debord, Guy. 1994. The Society of the Spectacle. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 59 (Winter): 3–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/778828
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Galloway, Alexander R. 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5658.001.0001
Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. Translated by Erik Butler. London: Verso.
Hardt, Michael. 1998. The Global Society of Control. Discourse 20 (3): 139–52.
May, Todd. 2006. The Philosophy of Foucault. Chesham: Acumen. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653744
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.